Page 2 of 11

Seven

Seven.  Novel number seven, that is. I started writing it today.

I needed to stop and reflect on that number a little. I suppose I should start with that frequently used qualifying: if you would have told me ten years ago that I would have … (fill in the blank) … for me it’s … written seven novels, I would have said you are crazy. Because ten years ago I was afraid to write. I had no talent. I had a poor vocabulary. No one anywhere would ever want to read what I had to say.

Yeah, that was me. Those self-doubts haven’t gone away. I suppose it should be “Whoa to the writer who never has self doubts!” I think that is someone in Ecclesiastes.

But I’ve learned, as I’ve written many times, that I no longer write for other people. I write because I am compelled to write. I write because I can’s stop the creative thoughts which keep exploding out of my brain. I write because I love it, and a poor review or a snide comment isn’t going to stop this writer anymore. It used to. And, might I add, the poor reviews and snide comments were typically self-inflicted.

But, wow, seven! 7! Bay! (That’s Vietnamese without the tone mark.)

So I started my seventh novel while my fifth novel hasn’t been released for very long. “Which Half David” came out in September, and it’s still in its infancy in regards to promotion. Honestly, I haven’t had the time to do much with it. I even feel my fourth novel, “A Love Story for a Nation,” has a much longer life to it as well. It’s only fifteen months out from its release and has yet to reach wide-spread distribution. Still working on it.

What about #6, you ask?

Six is done. It’s currently in the hands of some beta readers to get some feedback. It’s entitled “A Man too Old for a Place too Far.” Yeah, kind of long, but I like it. And as an independent author, I get to make the call! So there!

Anyways, #7 is my first sequel. It’s a continuation of novel #6. Honestly, I have no idea what I’m doing with it yet, except I wrote a powerful and gripping opening chapter, taking the story back to 1918. It will throw off the readers at first, but has some pretty cool tie-ins.

Seven. It’s a pretty special number. Perhaps someday I’ll hit 10. Or dare I say, 20?

Here’s a excerpt from a post I wrote nearly four years ago, from Feb 2013:

“With one novel published, another novel finished, and a third novel in its beginning stages, I am off on a four year writing plan. My goal? When 2017 rolls around, I hope to have five or more novels under my belt.

I have no goals of readership or success or money. Those are the least of my concerns. I want to write. I want to improve. I want to strive to be the best, creative writer I can be. If I do that, I believe all those other things will take care of themselves, and even if they don’t, I’m writing for myself because I enjoy it.

So I have a plan and I’m sticking to it.

Remember the motto: ‘Create, not consume.'”

I’m happy to see that I have met my goal, and this goal was met while also writing dozens of short plays and several full-length plays.

It’s pretty cool to see where I have come from and I wonder what these next four years will bring.

Hopefully, a lot more creativity.

 

Blog Writing Keeps Me Writing

I’ve discovered that writing a blog may not reach the world with my ideas, but it does do one thing: it keeps me writing. And as a writer, that’s important.

Blogging is a wonderful distraction from my creative writing which takes up most of my time. For me, creative writing takes a chunk of uninterrupted time, away from the house, away from the world, alone in my thoughts. But blog writing can be done anywhere at any time. I can be sitting in a restaurant with music blaring and I can write a blog. If I was writing creatively, the music would drive me crazy, and I would keep giving the waiters evil stares when a mind-numbing pop song would jolt on, interrupting my writing mojo. But blog writing, ahhhh, it’s relaxed. It’s ten minutes here and ten minutes there. Save draft. Get back to it later. No pressure. No deadlines. No plans. It works according to my schedule and not vice-versa.

Blogging also allows me to explore anything at all. That’s what I particularly like about my blog. I’ll write about everything. Whatever pops into my mind. Yesterday, I had beef on my mind so I wrote about beef rendang. The day before that I was writing about writing over break. Today, I’m writing about blogging.

Riveting. I know.

But I’ve written about history, drama, theatre, movie reviews, politics, travel, culture, religion, books, writing, and anything else I want.

The point being that if I want to write about these topics, it requires me to write. And as a writer, that’s what I consistently need to do: think about new topics, discuss experiences, look at what’s going on in my life, think about what’s coming next, and just processing life as it happens. All of these are essential aspects of being a writer. A diverse interest list will only help the creativity when the writer finds himself back in front of the keyboard ready to tackle the next topic.

So that’s my take on blogging. It’s good for the person. It’s good for the writer.

A Break from Work to Work

I’m fortunate to be staring down the beginning of nine days off of school. I am a teacher, and I enjoy teaching immensely. But I also enjoy my break times because that means I can concentrate on my other work: my writing endeavors. Here’s what’s on-tap for the coming week:

  • I plan on finishing my latest novel which is only a couple chapters away from a complete first draft. Very close. Can’t wait for this one.
  • I am revising a full-length play I just wrote in the last few weeks entitled “The Last Bastion.” I’m working with a local theatre to arrange a workshop reading of it later this year or in January of 2017.
  • I am still revising some of the scripts for my RLT Players show on December 1-3. I had to pare down one script to fit it under 10 minutes as it will be part of the Short & Sweet Festival in November here in Penang. I revised another one yesterday and sent the new script to the actors. Those poor actors! But I want to get it right!
  • I’m putting the finishing touches on a short musical piece which I’ll be producing for a show in May 2017. It’s entitled “It’s the End of the World and I Love You.”

All of this, and only one week. I’m looking forward to a fun-filled, productive writing week. What will you be up to?

Writing: If your brain keeps stewing, you probably aren’t finished.

As a rule, I typically do this: if my brain keeps stewing about a work you completed, it’s not complete and you need to revisit it.

I’m not talking about the revision process when a writer is still in the mode of improving a work. I’m talking about after the writer thinks the work is finished. If it keeps bothering you, if something isn’t sitting right, you need to take a second look.

This is an excellent reason to allow a finished work to sit untouched for a while before the writer publishes it or does anything else to it. Time allows the ideas to settle, and time will eventually tell you are not finished.

I came across this issue this past week. I wrote a piece (with a student of mine) this summer, a short play which will be part of my show in December. I thought it was finished, and we’ve actually started rehearsals with the piece. But this week, for whatever reason, I started thinking more about the structure and characters and the more I thought, the more I realized I wasn’t satisfied.

I didn’t really have time for another re-write, but I know me. Once I feel unsettled about a work, there’s no stopping me until I’m satisfied. It’s an annoying trait, but I think it’s a good one.

And so over the last couple of days, I went through two more re-writes, I cut out about 20% of the story, dropped one character completely, reedited many lines and ended up changing the title three more times. I actually sent the new updated script to my actors with one title, but I just changed it again about ten minutes ago.

Writing perfection doesn’t exist. A work is never completely done, it’s typically just abandoned by the writer. But sometimes, a finished work can haunt you until you give in and do the necessary work to improve it. Because that’s what is ultimately important. The process. The small increments of improvement played out over a long period of time.

Don’t settle. Listen to the unsettling voices inside. It will make the work better, and it will make you a better writer.

Getting More Excited about the Release of Novel #5

As I wrote last week, I’m working through my post-edited novel one last time – “Which Half David” releasing on September 15.

The more I read and put the final touches to it, I’m getting more excited about it. Not that I know how it will be received by readers because I absolutely have no idea.

But I’m getting more excited because I can finally say deep within me that this is the story I wanted to tell. It was a difficult story to write because of the setting and subject matter. Lots of sensitive topics and all kinds of things which can be interpreted by different people to be this or that. But all of that doesn’t matter. It’s a story. A work of fiction. It has become what I want to tell, so that’s all I can wish for.

Early on, it was a very different story. I wrote it differently for a variety of reasons, but my beta readers really put me back on the right track, and I’m very grateful for that.

The novel is cleaning up well and it has an interesting, weaving plot that starts at one place, goes to a completely different place and then cruises home to blend to the parts together. I like stories like that. Ones that seem to end but ultimately have meaning which unexpectedly pops up again.

As I’ve been contacting possible reviewers, I’ve put it in the following genres:

Genre — General Fiction – sub-genres: Literary, Crime, Religious, Cross-Cultural, Love Story

That’s kind of all over the place, isn’t it? That’s fairly typical of my writing. It touches on a lot of various themes and has a plot which moves in many directions. That’s the kind of stories I like. Lively with a touch of the unexpected.

I’m currently over the 50% location and hope to have it available for pre-sale in the next two weeks.

September 15 is the date. I can’t wait.

It will be fun and rewarding to have #5 “in the books” so I can focus completely on #6 which is coming quickly on the horizon. And I have big surprises with that one. Can’t wait.

It’s such fun being an indie author. Thanks for your support!

whichhalfdavidRGB-final-f

Creative Anchors. How to choose a direction for your story.

This is my term (as far as I know): Creative Anchor. I use that term to describe the first time an idea pops in my head which will “anchor” or force a story along. It’s a crucial creative idea which will make or break a chapter, sometimes even a story. Once you plop an anchor down, you either are stuck with it or will be forced to do a major re-write, in effect, ripping the creative anchor out of the ground and causing all kinds of headaches for your story. Sometimes, obviously, it still needs to be done.

So how do you choose creative anchors? I suppose the ways of choosing them are as varied as authors themselves. Let’s look at an example.

Whisked away somewhere. Where will it be? Antarctica? Punxatawney Pennsylvania? Cochem, Germany?  Each choice brings its own rewards and pitfalls. Once your character travels to any specific place, he or she is bound to the reality of those places and the baggage they carry with them.

This is why writers must choose the anchors carefully. NOT!

That sounds like the right thing to say, but I can attest in my own writing, that is not remotely how I do things. I do not think about those three destinations above and try to anticipate or brainstorm what each would mean for the story. Not at all! Never. That sounds horrible. I could never do that.

So how can you choose? Or better yet, how do I choose?

I just choose one. I wrote a story where I knew the character would travel and so I randomly chose a deserted island, not that I knew what was going to happen on that island or how that island would feed into the story. I chose it simply to find out what would happen. No other reason.

Obviously, what you choose is vitally important, but there is no way to know whether a different choice would be better – other than to re-write it with the different choice. You can certainly do that if you like, I don’t. Or rarely, I should say. I believe (and it could be a foolish belief) that I can write myself out of any situation I write myself into. That, to me, is one of the most enjoyable parts of the creative process.

So my advice to young writers would be not to get too caught up in your ideas and wonder which direction you should go. Just go! Do! Create. Discover. Give yourself a challenge and force yourself of a creative way out of it.

To me, that’s what writing is all about.

Where will the ideas come from?

Writing is such a mind game. The creative process toys with the writer to such an extent that I sometimes wonder who’s in control – do I control the creative process or does the creative process control me?

Ok, I’m already confused. But this I know: I have 10 dramatic sketches to write in the next two months for my new show coming later in the year. Where will the inspiration come from? What procedures, ideas, words, will I engage with to get this writing done?

If I’m still being confusing, this is actually what I’m saying: on August 1, I know I will have written 10 more short plays. But on June 6, today, I just don’t know the process which will actually accomplish that.

Creativity is so strange. The other day, I sat down to write one of these 10 and the creative process came so intuitively that I couldn’t have even described it to someone if I tried.

Writing happens by writing. That’s as best as I can explain it. One chain of ideas linked together, all starting with a simple thought, and expounded on by a few words. Those words give new life to new words and soon I’m following the rabbit down the trail or I’m plowing a footpath through the jagger bushes (sorry, jagger bush is a colloquial western PA term!)  A writer might get jabbed and pricked along the way. It could be bloody and painful, but soon enough, a clearing will appear and the most beautiful scene will present itself to make the process worth it.

And then, of course, the writing will take on new life as the author re-writes and re-edits and re-writes again until the remaining work is sleek and ready to be performed.

In the end, that’s the best part of all.

In December, there will be a show. I just can’t tell you definitively what it will look like. I need a few more jagger bushes to slap me in the face before I will know that.

Hey Writers: How Varied Are Your Interests?

Some people have commented that I’m a little out of the ordinary. As a writer, I think that is to my advantage. Writers are a strange breed – I’m starting to think.

I’ve had some people call me a renaissance man. I take that as a high compliment whether it’s true or not. But I’m convinced that any writer who puts him or herself into a varied type of activities will become a better writer. If we want to write about the scope of human experience, we have to understand a wide swath of that experience. That’s why I’m glad I’m a little different. Consider this:

  • I’m a history teacher who majored in English.
  • I’m a drama teacher who is primarily a history teacher.
  • I’m a writer of novels and plays.
  • I write both short plays and full-length plays.
  • I’m a softball coach.
  • I love to cook, but I don’t like using recipes.
  • I’ve never acted but I teach people how to act.
  • I love politics and economics but I’ve never had a course in either.
  • I’m fascinated with technology and computing.
  • I’m not an artist, but I love creating things with photoshop. Self-taught. (still not very good.)
  • I’m not a musician, but I taught myself enough chords on the guitar that has helped me become a writer of musicals.
  • Yes, I love musicals even though I’m a man.
  • I’m also interested in religion and culture.
  • I’m a news junkie, reading everything from hard news to soft puff pieces.

As I write, I look back on all of these experiences, and I realize that each and every one of them help me become a better writer. The wider the net, the greater chance that a particular idea or scene will cement itself in my mind.

Out of all of my interests, history is probably the one that has influenced my writing the most. It has grounded my writing in the real, the here and now, the tangible, which helps me build realistic and gripping human stories. Or at least that is my goal.

So what about you, writer?  Have you expanded your interests?

It is both helpful and advisable for you to do so.

It will widen your scope and make your writing more interesting.

 

 

What I Learned by Re-Re-Writing My New Novel

A while back, I posted how I decided to re-write my new novel which I had previously re-written and re-vised enough. (or so I thought) But once I started getting some feedback from readers, I realized that I had made some mistakes, and regardless of how painful and time-consuming it would be, I needed to re-re-write the entire novel again!

That was a month ago that I decided to do that. So here I am, a month later with a completely different manuscript. I’m happy it only took me a month to rewrite it because it was quite extensive. Here’s what I changed:

  • I added four brand new chapters.
  • The length of the novel increased from 86,000 words to 99,000.
  • The tone of the novel is much improved.
  • I added backstory to all four main characters.
  • I completely changed the ending.
  • I overhauled the relationships in the story.
  • I drastically changed wordings to make it more like me.
  • I deleted huge passages.
  • I improved silly dialogues.
  • I basically gutted it. (and it needed it)

And while I didn’t necessarily enjoy doing all of the above, it’s what had to be done if I want to be a serious author. I’ve always told myself that I will not accept shortcuts and this novel was the first one which really tried my patience. But I’m happy I fought through it, and readers will be happy too. It’s much better. Even if a reader still doesn’t like it, it’s MUCH better. If they don’t like it now, they would have HATED it then.

It wasn’t a terrible novel before. It just wasn’t my novel. What I learned is this:

I have to take the readers into account. Yes, it’s my novel. I drive it. I create it. But when I’m too caught up in the “me” aspect, I can lose sight of my own voice. I can make my writing sound different from what people expected. That’s not always a good thing. Trying new things is one thing, but trying to be someone you’re not is completely different. I righted the ship.

Don’t rush. Don’t push out a product just to meet a deadline. Hey, we’re indie authors. We make our own deadlines. Don’t impose false deadlines which aren’t going to be helpful in the long run. The story is what’s important. The story should tell you what the deadline is.

Listen to your beta readers. I hate to say this because it sounds like I’m patting myself on the back. I’m not. I’m actually kicking myself. It would have been easy to get defensive with  my beta readers and tried to explain why I did such and such in my earlier drafts, but that wouldn’t have proved anything. Only that I’m stubborn and short-sighted.

Be humble. Take criticism. Learn. Improve. Strive.

These are words I have told myself to take to heart as an indie author.

Listen and learn.

I think I have, and my novel is much better for it.

97,000 Words. Where did my succinctness go?

When I first got in this long-story-writing business, I had to look up the definition of novel to see how many words it took to create a novel. Well, the general consensus I found was 50,000, so as I was writing my first novel, I obsessed over that number thinking how it would be impossible to reach it. I am, after all, a succinct writer. I like pithiness. I can’t stand rambling on about this or that for 20 pages at a time aka Henry James or whomever you like. I like stories to move. I like plot. I like action. But I also like depth.

So I slugged it out and eventually ended up at 61,000 words. Many of my readers said “fast paced,” “easy read,” “a little rushed.” I didn’t mind any of those descriptions. They are, after all, much better than slow and plodding in my opinion. My second novel weighed in at about the same length, then my third “ballooned” to an unprecedented 80,000.

It was at that point when a reader whom I trust said something to me. “Remember. Readers like to read.”

It was quite revolutionary for me as a pithy writer. So readers don’t mind words? What? Who knew? I thought they were like me and couldn’t wait to get to the ending.

With that in mind I wrote my next novel, a whopping 61,000 words. Hey, it’s still important only to tell the story you have, right? Don’t make it long if it makes it worse.

So now, as I’m revising novel #5, I found myself today looking at the number 97,000. Seriously, a Sasse novel approaching 100,000 words. I’ll probably get there, too. I never thought I’d see the day.

The question that must be answered is this: is this new novel a better novel at 100,000 words than it would be at 60,000?

Yes. Most definitely.

Is it better at 97,000 than it was after the last revision which ended in the 80,000s?

Absolutely.

Would it be better at 120,000 than at 97?

Certainly not.

I think I found the sweet spot. I’ve realized that it’s okay for writers to produce a lot of words. I wonder if in some bizarre universe that a writer could make a living from them.

A novel thought.